Opening name: Lisitsin Gambit
Opening line: 1. Nf3 f5 2. e4
Lichess Board
Wikibooks Page
Winning percentages
White: 122 (37.77%)
Black: 110 (34.06%)
Draws: 91 (28.17%)
Lisitsin Gambit
2. e4 is a very counter-intuitive move, as after the pawn is captured White does not get to make a developing move but must move an already developed piece again. However, practice has shown that the knight landing on g5 is hard to chase away and creates certain tactical threats (more than simply Nxe4!) that compensate for the lost pawn.
2...fxe4 is the only way to challenge White's idea.
"The way to refute a gambit is to accept it." - Wilhelm Steinitz
2...e5 transposes to the notorious Latvian Gambit. This may actually be a good practical choice for someone who knows nothing about the Lisitsin, as it gives Black a greater initiative.
When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.
Most popular responses
2...fxe4 (Lisitsin Gambit) Black logically accepted White's gambit and is now attacking White's f3-knight. By far the best move to save it is 3. Ng5. Lichess Analysis - Wikibooks (523003 games)
Engine Evaluation
Depth: 38
Score: 0.0
Best Move: fxe4
PV Line: 1. Nf3 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Ng5 Nf6 4. d3 Nc6 5. dxe4 h6 6. Nf3 e5 7. Bc4
Historical games for Lisitsin Gambit
Game | Result | Year |
Bu, Xiangzhi (2714) vs Zhang, Zhong (2649) | 1/2-1/2 | 2008 |
Kazhgaleyev, Murtas (2599) vs Nikolic, Predrag (2657) | 0-1 | 2007 |
Lautier, Joel (2560) vs Bareev, Evgeny (2680) | 1/2-1/2 | 1991 |
Vaganian, Rafael A (2625) vs Georgiev, Kiril (2595) | 0-1 | 1988 |
Rohde, Michael A (2585) vs Palatnik, Semon (2510) | 1-0 | 1992 |
Zaibi, A.. (2381) vs Amin, B.. (2695) | 1/2-1/2 | 2021 |
Malakhatko, Vadim (2435) vs Onischuk, Alexander (2630) | 1/2-1/2 | 1998 |
Darcyl, T. (2405) vs Granda Zuniga, J. (2658) | 0-1 | 2017 |
Piket, Jeroen (2615) vs Van Mil, Johan (2445) | 1-0 | 1992 |
Bordovsky, Vladimir (2425) vs Kuzubov, Y. (2635) | 0-1 | 2016 |